![Ublock mozilla firefox](https://cdn1.cdnme.se/5447227/9-3/screenshot_2_64e62946ddf2b36521902657.jpg)
![ublock mozilla firefox ublock mozilla firefox](https://news-cdn.softpedia.com/images/news2/how-to-install-firefox-preview-with-ublock-origin-on-android-529101-8.jpg)
Mozilla can already hire from anywhere, too, can't they? > Plus, they can get a lot more software talent for their Euro in the EU (esp. But not from a macroeconomic economic point of view, or just getting bang-for-your-buck. That's, alas, true from a political point of view. > Also, Mozilla is an American company the EU would naturally want to give money to an EU company that hires EU citizens to do such high-value, high-paid work, not send that money to the US.
![ublock mozilla firefox ublock mozilla firefox](https://i.redd.it/tjd4n893lswz.png)
Or perhaps they just have different priorities, and the EU can specifically pay them to do some work on EU priorities? > The reason for forking rather than throwing money at Mozilla is that Mozilla doesn't seem to be doing a great job of managing themselves. (Some people even go so far as claiming that outsourced government projects are worse than in-house ones.) I skimmed over the issue here: my more precise point is that government entities generally aren't good at building things when they outsource the actual building, either. I wouldn't expect EU government employees to work directly on FF, but rather for it to be contracted out to some EU company or companies.
![ublock mozilla firefox ublock mozilla firefox](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/3E5cv9tUQG0/maxresdefault.jpg)
Government entities aren't any good at building almost anything, but that's why they contract work out to private companies.
![Ublock mozilla firefox](https://cdn1.cdnme.se/5447227/9-3/screenshot_2_64e62946ddf2b36521902657.jpg)